Grotesquely unreasonable and SMSF trustees paying death benefits: Re Marsella
Posted in Cases, Death Benefits, Succession Planning, SMSF Strategy, Trustee Education, Tax, CGT on Apr 11th, 2019 Comments
In this podcast we look at the recent cases of Re Marcella and Eichmann and Commissioner of Taxation.
Re Marcella
The Re Marcella judgement provides a great depth of analysis of how trust law principles apply to an SMSF. The case highlights the need for trustees to properly consider who to pay a death benefit to and when the courts may intervene where bad faith or grotesque unreasonableness is involved.
In this podcast we will cover:
- The key points of Re Marcella
- Why this case is important
- How this case is different from Katz v Grossman
Eichmann and Commissioner of Taxation
We will cover:
- Why was the subject property was considered an active asset for small business CGT relief purposes; how this case is different from Re Karapanagiotidis and Commissioner of Taxation [2007] AATA 1961
- Whether there are implications for the definition of business real property
- Comparing this case with a similar example in SMSFR 2009/1
Hosts: Bryce Figot, Special Counsel, Shaun Backhaus, Lawyer and Christian Pakpahan, Lawyer DBA Lawyers